[[lecture-data]]2024-11-06
5. Chapter 5
last time we did
Theorem
Suppose is a matrix norm on . Then for all ,
Lemma
Suppose is a matrix norm on . Let be invertible. Then defined by (for all ) is And this is also a matrix norm on .
(demonstration) and we have
For all
(see invertible matrix norms)
Theorem
Let be fixed. For all , there exists a matrix norm on such that .
( in particular, this implies that )
be a Jordan decomposition. For any , define diagonal such that .
Let
Note that where has the same diagonals as , but each of the 1s turn into . And this has .
So define invertible matrix norm
(see we can find a matrix norm that evaluates arbitrarily close to the spectral radius)
Theorem
For any , if and only if
) if , then by since we can find a matrix norm that evaluates arbitrarily close to the spectral radius we have some norm such that . So we have as by norm equivalence!
(
Conversely, suppose as . Then any eigenvalue and eigenvector pair, say . Then as . Since , we must have . Thus .
(see matrices are nilpotent in the limit when spectral radius is less than 1)
Theorem
For any and any matrix norm on , we have .
since matrix norms are bounded below by the spectral radius, then we simply take the th root.
Let be given. Then . Thus since matrices are nilpotent in the limit when spectral radius is less than 1, we see that . ie, there exists some such that for all we have that .
ie. . ie
Since is arbitrary, the result follows.
Theorem
Suppose is a NLS. It is complete if and only if all absolutely convergent sequences converge.
ie converges to a vector in .
(without proof)
(see normed linear spaces are complete if and only if all absolutely convergent series converge)
Corollary
For all define . This is well-defined. (see matrix exponential)
be any matrix norm. Then
Let
by homogeneity and submultiplicity
When : can I say that ? Well, no. But it still converges. (as long as is finite). I can also choose an induced matrix norm and using norm equivalence it is ok :)