Functional Analysis Lecture 3

[[lecture-data]]

← Lecture 2 | Lecture 4 →
Lecture Notes: Rodriguez, page 14

1. Normed Spaces and Banach Spaces

Last Time

subspace and quotients

Recall

Subspace

Let V be a normed vector space and WV. W is a subspace if for all λ1,λ2K and w1,w2W then

λ1w1+λ2w2W

ie closed under linear combinations

see subspace

Theorem

A subspace WV of a Banach space is Banach if and only if WV is closed.

Proof

Exercise

The Proof is left as an exercise

see closed subspaces of banach spaces are banach

Quotient

Let WV be a subspace. We define an equivalence relation on V by

vvvvW

Define [v]={vV:vv} the equivalence class of v. Then

V|W={[v]:vV}

is called the quotient space which we typically call "V mod W" and notate as

[v]=v+W

V|W is a vector space such that for all v1,v2V and λK

  1. (v1+W)+(v2+W):=(v1+v2)+W
  2. λ(v+W)=λv+W
Note

W=0+W=w+WwW

see quotient of a vector space

Theorem

Let |||| be a semi-norm on V. Then

E:={vV:||v||=0}

is a subspace of V and

||v+E||v|E:=||v||,v+EV|E

defines a norm on the space V|E

Proof

E is a subspace since v1,v2E and λ1,λ2K we have

||λ1v1+λ2v2|||λ1|||v1||+|λ2|||v2||=0||λ1v1+λ2v2||=0

We first show ||||V|E is well-defined, ie

v+E=v+E||v||=||v||

Suppose v+E=v+E. ie, there exists eE such that v+v+e. Then

||v||=||v+e||||v||+||e||=||v||||v||||v|| and also ||v||||v||||v||=||v||
Exercise

To complete this proof, all that is left is verification that this function is a norm.

  • recall that since this is a semi-norm, homogeneity and the triangle inequality are already satisfied
  • definiteness can be shown by noting that everything that evaluates to 0 in the norm is in the equivalence class of 0+E
Exercise

Let V be a normed vector space and WV a closed subspace. Then V|W is a normed vector space.

Baire Category Theorem

Let M be a complete metric space and let {Cn}n be a collection of closed subsets of M such that $$M = \bigcup_{n \in N}C_{n}$$Then at least one of the Cn contain an open ball

B(x,r)={yM:d(x,y)<r}

ie, at least one Cn has an interior point.

Note

A set that does not contain an interior point is called nowhere dense. Sometimes when we apply this theorem, we do not need Cn to be closed. Then the result is that their closures must contain and open ball. ie, we cannot have all Cn be all nowhere dense.

Note

We can use this theorem to prove that there exists a continuous function that is nowhere differentiable

Proof (by contradiction)

Suppose BWOC that there is some collection of closed subsets of M such that nCn=M and all Cn are nowhere dense.

Note

we'll show that there is a sequence in M that does not converge

Since M contains an open ball but C1 does not, we have MC1. Thus there is some p1MC1. Since C1 is closed but MC1 is open, this implies that ϵ1>0 s.t. B(p1,ϵ1)C1=.

Now, B(p1,ϵ13)C2 means there exists some p2MC2. And since C2 is closed, there exists 0<ϵ2<ϵ13 such that B(p2,ϵ2)C2=

Now, suppose there we have found k such points. Then for each j=1,,k we have pjCj withϵj such that B(pj,ϵj)Cj=

Since B(pk,ϵk3)Ck+1, there exists some pk+1B(pk,ϵk3) such that pk+1Ck+1

Then there exists ϵk+1<ϵk3 such that B(pk+1,ϵk+1)Ck+1=

Thus, by indiction, we have found a sequence of points {pk}kM and ϵk(0,ϵ1) such that for all k,

  1. pjB(pj1,ϵj13)
  2. B(pj,ϵj)Cj=

This sequence {pk}k is Cauchy because for all k,N, we have

d(pk+1,pk+)d(pk,pk+1)+d(pk+1,pk+2)++d(pk+1,pk+)<ϵk3+ϵk+13++ϵk+13<ϵ13k+ϵ13k+1++ϵ13k+<ϵ1n=k13k=ϵ13k(1113)=ϵ123k+1

Since M is complete, there exists some pM such that pkp as k.

Now, for all kN, we have

d(pk+1,pk++1)<ϵk+1[13+132++13]<ϵk+1n=13n=ϵk+12limd(pk+1,pl++1)=d(pk+1,p)ϵk+12<ϵk6

So as , we have

d(pk+1,p)d(pk,p)d(pk,pk+1)+d(pk+1,p)13ϵ+16ϵk<ϵk

ie, pB(pk,ϵk)=Bk for all k. And each of these balls has BkCk=. Thus p is not in any of the Ck ie pkCk=M

see Baire Category Theorem

Uniform Boundedness Theorem

Let V be a vector space, B be a Banach space, and {Tn} a sequence in B(B,V). Then if for all bB we have

supn||Tnb||<

(ie the sequence is pointwise bounded) then we have

supn||Tn||<

(ie the operator norms are bounded)

Proof

For all kN, define

Ck={bB:||b||1,supn||Tnb||k}

Then each set is closed because if {bn}Ck and bnb then we have ||b||=limn||bn||=1. And for all mN we have

||Tmb||=limn||Tmbn||

since each of the operators Tm are continuous. And ||Tmbn||k because bnCk, so Ck must be closed.

Now, we also have

{bB:||b||1}=knCk

because for any bB, there is no k such that supm||Tmb||k.

So LHS is complete because it is a closed subset of M, and so by Baire's Theorem, one of the Ck must contain an open ball B(b0,δ0).

Thus for any bB(0,δ0), we have that b0+bB(b0,δ0)Ck so

supn||Tn(b0+b)||k

Then since both b0,b0+bB(b0,δ0), we have

supn||Tnb||=supn||Tnb0+Tn(b0+b)||supn||Tnb0||+supn||Tn(b0+b)||k+k

Thus, rescaling, we have for any nN and all bB with ||b||=1, we have

||Tn(δ02b)||2k||Tnb||4k

ie the operator norm of Tn is bounded for all n, and therefore its sup is bounded as well.

see uniform boundedness theorem

Review

#flashcards/math/functional

Created 2025-06-03 Last Modified 2025-06-05