[[lecture-data]]2024-11-18
Exam december 4:
- Chapter 5 and 6
- Norms, Gersgorin discs, today we’ll talk about positive matrices
- cohesive subject material
- We’ll go through what we should know
6. Chapter 6
Recall from last time that non-interior eigenvalues of ALL gersgorin discs of irreducible matrices are on the boundary of ALL discs
Theorem
Let be irreducible. If is not interior of any Gersgorin Disc, then is on the boundary of ALL Gersgorin discs.
Last time, we showed that irreducible diagonally dominant (with strictness in one row) matrices are invertible, which was a relaxation (or substitution) of the theorem showing that strictly diagonally dominant matrices are invertible.
Corrolary
Suppose is irreducible. Suppose there exists some index such that (ie there is some row sum that is strictly less than the maximum row sum). Then
such that . Then for all , we have by the triangle inequality and
BWOC, suppose
|\lambda-a_{ii}| &\geq |\lambda| - |a_{i i}| \\ &=\lvert \lvert A \rvert \rvert _{\infty, \infty} - |a_{i i}| \\ &\geq \left( \sum_{j} |a_{ij}| \right) - |a_{ii}| \\ &= \sum_{j \neq i} |a_{i j}| \\ \end{aligned}$$ Thus for all $i$, $\lambda$ is [[Concept Wiki/eigenvalue interior of gersgorin disc\|not interior]] to the associated [[Concept Wiki/Gersgorin Disc]]. So by irreducibility of $A$ and since [[Concept Wiki/non-interior eigenvalues of ALL gersgorin discs of irreducible matrices are on the boundary of ALL discs]], we must have that $\lambda$ is on the boundary of ALL Gersgorin discs of $A$. In particular, equality holds in all the inequalities of $|\lambda-a_{ii}| \geq |\lambda| - |a_{i i}|$. But then there is no $p$th row that is less than the maximum row sum $\implies \impliedby$. Thus there must not exist such a $\lambda$.(see irreducible matrices with row sums not all equal have spectral radius less than the maximum row sum)
8. Chapter 8
Nonnegative and positive matrices (see Chapter 8)
Notation
- We will still use the notation , but for this chapter they are ALWAYS real.
- We will look at the spectrum of these matrices, so their eigenvalues and eigenvectors may be complex.
- "" means entrywise, for all we have . Same for
- "" means entrywise for all we have . Same for
- "" means I want to take the entrywise absolute value of . So this is a matrix where , . And this can be used for complex-valued matrices as well.
Nonnegative and Positive Matrices
"" means entrywise, for all we have . Same for . If , then is a positive matrix.
"" means entrywise for all we have .
"" means I want to take the entrywise absolute value of . So this is a matrix where , . And this can be used for complex-valued matrices as well.
(see positive matrix)
Observation
Observe that and also . This is just an immediate application of the triangle inequality component-wise for these matrices.
Further, for any positive integer , we have by immediate application of the above.
Finally, if , then
Proposition
Suppose and ie nonnegative matrix. If for all we have (for some ) ie all the row sums are the same, then
be the vector of all 1s. Then . So with eigenvector and , where the second inequality comes from matrix norms are bounded below by the spectral radius.
Let
(see nonnegative matrices with equal row sums have row sum equal to the spectral radius)
Theorem
Let such that . (Then must be a nonnegative matrix). Then .
, we have (see notes on positive matrices). Since the frobenius norm is absolute (monotone), we have And this yields Now, let . For each , the above relationship holds. Thus, this relationship will hold at the limit. And since the limit of the powered norm is the spectral radius, we have that
For all indices
(see matrices that dominate nonnegative matrices have dominant spectral radius)
Corrolary
Let such that is nonnegative matrix. Then
By way of comparison, we have
then the result is trivial.
If
Otherwise, obtain from where for each , multiply the th row of by . Note that each row sum of is equal to the minimum!
Further, since each row sum of is , we have that since nonnegative matrices with equal row sums have row sum equal to the spectral radius.
Finally, since each scaling factor is , we have that . And since matrices that dominate nonnegative matrices have dominant spectral radius, we get that
(see the min row sum is a lower bound for the spectral radius of a nonnegative matrix)
Note
Since the min row sum is a lower bound for the spectral radius of a nonnegative matrix, if ie is a positive matrix, then . ( we can also see this since matrices are nilpotent iff all eigenvalues 0)
Note
And if and irreducible, then .
is irreducible, then it has no rows of all zero. Thus each row sum must be strictly positive. And since the min row sum is a lower bound for the spectral radius of a nonnegative matrix, this means the lower bound for the spectral radius is positive.
If
(see nonnegative, irreducible matrices have positive spectral radius)
Theorem