Lecture 30

[[lecture-data]]

2024-11-11

Nearing the end of:

5. Chapter 5

Last time, we saw how condition number determines the amount of noise in a linear system. We also saw a similar thing when we are inverting a matrix with some noise thrown in!

Absolute Vector Norm

The vector norm on Cn is called absolute precisely when for all x∈Cn it holds that

|||x|||=||x||

where |x| is taken component wise

Example

All ℓp norms are absolute since ℓp(x)=(∑|x|p)1/p

(see absolute vector norm)

Monotone Vector Norm

We call a vector norm monotone precisely when for all x,y∈Cn,

|x|≤|y|⟹||x||≤||y||

again, where |x| is taken component wise.

Example

All ℓp norms are also monotone!

(see monotone vector norm)

Theorem

Suppose ||⋅|| is a norm on Cn. The following are equivalent:

  1. ||⋅|| is monotone
  2. ||⋅|| is absolute
  3. The matrix norm ||⋅||′ induced by ||⋅|| satisfies the following: for all diagonal D∈Mn
||D||′=max{|dii|}

this is called the "funky diagonal property" 😊

Example

Proof

(1)⟹(2)

Suppose ||⋅|| is monotone. For all x∈Cn, we have that |x|≤||x||⟹||x||≤|x|⟹|||x|||=||x||

(2)⟹(1)

Read the book :)

(1)⟹(3)

Suppose ||⋅|| is monotone. Let D∈Mn be diagonal. For any x∈Cn≠0, Dx=[d11x1d22x2…dnnxn]. So |Dx|≤|maxi|dii|x|.
So by monotonicity, we have

=maxi|dii|⋅||x||⟹||Dx||||x||≤maxi|dᵢ|

Equality is attained with x=ek the standard basis vector with 1 in the kth position, and where k is the index of the largest |di,i|. Thus we get

||D||′:=max||Dx||||x||=maxi|dii|

(3)⟹(1)

Suppose ||⋅|| induces ||⋅||′ with the funky diagonal property. Suppose x,y∈Cn such that |x|≤y. We define the following diagonal matrix D:

  • for i=1,2,…,n, let dii={xiyiif yi≠00if yi=0
    So, Dy=x and ||D||′=maxi|dii|≤1. So
||x||=||Dy||≤(∗)||D||′||y||≤(∗∗)||y||

Where (∗) is by definition of the induced matrix norm and (∗∗) is because ||D||′≤1.

And the result follows!

Thus the result follows :)

(see funky diagonal property)

Berer-Fike Theorem

Let ||⋅|| be a matrix norm on Mn induced by a monotone vector norm. Let A,ΔA∈Mn be such that A is diagonalizable as A=SDS−1.

Then for all λ∈σ(A+ΔA), there exists a τ∈σ(A) such that |λ−τ|≤||ΔA||κ||⋅||(S)

If A is also normal, then ||λ−τ||≤||ΔA||2,2

Proof

Assume λ∉σ(A). (otherwise, the result is trivial).
λI−[A+ΔA] is singular (since λ is an eigenvalue of A+ΔA). So
S−1[λI−[A+ΔA]]S is also singular. But note that λI−D is invertible (since λ∉σ(A)) and this inverse has diagonal entries 1λ−dii.

S−1[λI−[A+ΔA]]S=λI−D−S−1ΔAS⟹(λI−D)−1[λI−D−S−1ΔAS]=I−[λI−D]−1S−1ΔAS is singular⟹1≤||(λI−D)−1S−1ΔAS||(∗)⟹1≤||(λI−D)−1||⋅||S−1ΔAS||=1|λ−τ|||S−1AS||(∗∗)

If A is normal, then S can be chosen to be unitary! So

||S||2,22=ρ(S∗S)=ρ(I)=1

So κ||⋅||2,2(S)=1⋅1=1

(see Berer-Fike Theorem)

Note

If A,ΔA are hermitian, Weyl's Theorem says

λ1(ΔA)+λk(A)≤λk(A+ΔA)≤λn(ΔA)+λk(A)⟹λ1(ΔA)≤λk(A+ΔA)−λk(A)≤λn(A)⟹|λk(A+ΔA)−λk(A)|≤ρ(ΔA)≤||ΔA||2,2

ie, we can say WHICH eigenvalue each eigenvalue of the perturbed matrix is "close to"