Lecture 28

[[lecture-data]]

2024-11-06

5. Chapter 5

last time we did

Theorem

Suppose ||⋅|| is a matrix norm on Mn. Then for all A∈Mn, ρ(A)≤||A||

(see matrix norms are bounded below by the spectral radius)

Lemma

Suppose ||⋅|| is a matrix norm on Mn. Let S∈Mn be invertible. Then ||⋅||S defined by (for all A∈Mn) is

||A||S=||S−1AS||

And this is also a matrix norm on Mn.

(demonstration)

For all A,B∈Mn and α∈Cn we have

  1. A≠0⟹S−1AS≠0⟹||A||S=||S−1AS||≥0
  2. ||αA||S=||αS−1AS||=|α|⋅||S−1AS||=|α|⋅||A||S
  3. ||A+B||S=||S−1(A+B)S||=||S−1AS+S−1BS||≤||S−1AS||+||S−1BS||=||A||S+||B||S
  4. ||AB||S=||S−1(AB)S||=||S−1ASS−1BS||≤||S−1AS||⋅||S−1BS||=||A||S⋅||B||S

(see invertible matrix norms)

Theorem

Let A∈Mn be fixed. For all ϵ>0, there exists a matrix norm ||⋅|| on Mn such that ||A||≤ρ(A)+ϵ.

( in particular, this implies that infmatrix norms ||⋅||||A||=ρ(A))

Proof

Let A=SJS−1 be a Jordan decomposition. For any ϵ>0, define D diagonal such that Dii=ϵi.

Note that D−1JD=J^ where J^ has the same diagonals as J, but each of the 1s turn into ϵ. And this has ||⋅||1,1≤ρ(A)+ϵ.

So define invertible matrix norm ||A||1,1SD=||D−1S−1ASD||1,1=||D−1JD||1,1≤ρ(A)+ϵ

(see we can find a matrix norm that evaluates arbitrarily close to the spectral radius)

Theorem

For any A∈Mn, limk→∞Ak=0 if and only if ρ(A)<1

Proof

(⟹) if ρ(A)<1, then by since we can find a matrix norm that evaluates arbitrarily close to the spectral radius we have some norm such that ||A||<1. So we have
||Ak−0||=||A||k→0 as k→∞ by norm equivalence!

(⟸) Conversely, suppose Ak→0 as k→∞. Then any eigenvalue and eigenvector pair, say λ,x≠0. Then Akx=λkx→0 as k→∞. Since x≠0, we must have |λ|<1. Thus ρ(A)<1.

(see matrices are nilpotent in the limit when spectral radius is less than 1)

Theorem

For any A∈Mn and any matrix norm on Mn, we have limk→∞||Ak||1/k=ρ(A) .

Proof

ρ(A)k=ρ(Ak)≤||Ak||⟹ρ(A)≤||Ak||1/k
since matrix norms are bounded below by the spectral radius, then we simply take the kth root.

Let ϵ>0 be given. Then ρ(1ρ(A)+ϵA)<1. Thus since matrices are nilpotent in the limit when spectral radius is less than 1, we see that (1ρ(A)+ϵA)k→0. ie, there exists some M such that for all k≥M we have that ||(1ρ(A)+ϵA)k||<1.

ie. ||Ak||<(ρ(A)+ϵ)k. ie ||Ak||k≤ρ(A)+ϵ

Since ϵ is arbitrary, the result follows.

(see the limit of the powered norm is the spectral radius)

Theorem

Suppose V,||⋅|| is a NLS. It is complete if and only if all absolutely convergent sequences converge.

ie {x(i)}i=1∞⊆V,∑i=1∞||x(i)||<∞⟹∑i=1∞x(i) converges to a vector in V.

(without proof)

(see normed linear spaces are complete if and only if all absolutely convergent series converge)

Corollary

For all A∈Mn define eA=∑i=0∞1i!Ai. This is well-defined. (see matrix exponential)

Proof

Let ||⋅|| be any matrix norm. Then

\sum_{i=0}^\infty \left\lvert \left\lvert \frac{1}{i!} A^i \right\rvert \right\rvert \leq \sum_{i=0}^\infty \frac{1}{i!}\lvert \lvert A \rvert \rvert { #i} = e^{\lvert \lvert A \rvert \rvert }

by homogeneity and submultiplicity

When i=0 : can I say that ||A0||≤||A||0=1 ? Well, no. But it still converges. (as long as n is finite). I can also choose an induced matrix norm and using norm equivalence it is ok :)

(see the matrix exponential is well-defined)