Lecture 26

[[lecture-data]]

2024-11-01

Readings

5. Chapter 5

Recall the definition of continuity for linear functions and that linear functions with finite dimensional domain are continuous.

Note

This means we can think of matrices both as

  • vectors in matrix-vector space
  • as analytic objects (as functions)
Notation

Let A∈Mm,n. We can view "A":Cn,||⋅||p→Cm,||⋅||q. Then the operator norm

||A||p,q=maxx∈Cn≠0=||Ax||q||x||p=maxz∈Cn,||z||p=1||Ax||q
  • since the unit sphere is compact (closed and bounded is equivalent for vector spaces) and A is continuous (and the norm is also continuous), the function will obtain its maximum.
Example

Let A∈Mm,n. Then the ||A||2,2 is the greatest singular vlaue of A.

To see this, consider A=UΣV∗. Then since U,V are unitary we have that

||Ax||2,2=maxx≠0||Ax||22||x||2=maxx≠0x∗A∗Axx∗x=λmax(A∗A)

And λmax(A∗A)=λmax(Σ∗Σ)=σmax2

(see)

Proposition

Let A∈Mm,n. Then

||A||1,1=maxj∑i=1m|aij|$$(ie,themaximumcolumnsum)and$$||A||∞,∞=maxi∑j=1n|aij|$$(iethemaximumrowsum)>[!proof]>Let$x≠0∈Cn$.Consider$||Ax||1$(the"Manhattannorm"becausewe"walkalongtheblocks").Wehave$$>||Ax||1=∑i=1m|∑j=1naijxj|>≤∑i=1m∑j=1n|aij||xj|>=∑j=1n|xj|∑i=1m|aij|>≤||x||1[maxj∑i=1m(|aij|)]>

Let j^ be the index for the maximum column sum. Then ||ej^||1=1 and ||Aej^||1=maxj∑i=1m|aij|.

Thus maxx∈Cn≠0||Ax||1||x||1=maxj∑i=1m|aij|

(see matrix 1 norm is max column sum)

Proposition

Let V,||⋅|| be a finite dimensional NLS with basis B. Now, consider V,V∗ as vector spaces. (recall the dual space of a vector space).

Dual Norm

Let ||⋅|| be a norm on Kn. The dual norm ||⋅||D on Kn is defined as : for all y∈Kn,

\lvert \lvert y \rvert \rvert { #D} = \max_{x \in K^n, \lvert \lvert x \rvert \rvert =1} \lvert y^*x \rvert = \max_{x \in K^n \neq 0} \frac{\lvert y^*x \rvert}{\lvert \lvert x \rvert \rvert }
Note

It is called the dual norm, because it is the norm on the dual space!

(see dual norm)

Note

Let ||⋅|| be a norm on Kn. Then for all x,y∈Kn we have

\lvert y^*x \rvert \leq \lvert \lvert x \rvert \rvert \cdot \lvert \lvert y \rvert \rvert { #D}

And for all x,y∈K, we have

|y∗x|≤||x||1||y||∞

ie the dual of the 1 norm is the infinity norm

Theorem

The 1 norm is the dual norm of the infinity norm (and vice versa):

Proof

|y∗x|=|∑i=1nyi―xi|≤∑i=1n|yi||xi|≤∑i=1n||y||∞|xi|=||x||1||y||∞

(see the dual of the 1 norm is the infinity norm)

Proposition

On Kn, we have ||⋅||1D=||⋅||∞ and ||⋅||22=||⋅||22

Proof

By definition, the dual norm is maxx∈Kn,||x||=1|y∗x|.

Given y∈Knm if we restrict to x:||x||1=1, then by definition of the dual, we have |y∗x|≤max||x||1=1|y∗x|=||y||∞. Equality holds exactly when x is all zeros, except for a 1 in the position corresponding to arg⁡maxiyi.

Given an x∈Kn. If we restrict to the y:||y||∞=1, then |y∗x|≤||x||1 . Equality holds exactly when we choose an y such that each entry is some unit eiθ so that all components of y∗x are real.

Given y∈Kn. If we restrict to x:||x||2=1, then |y∗x|≤||y||2. Equality holds for (unit length ℓ2) when x=1||y||2y, and an exactly analogous argument occurs for the reverse.