[[lecture-data]]2024-11-01
Readings
- a
5. Chapter 5
Recall the definition of continuity for linear functions and that linear functions with finite dimensional domain are continuous.
Note
This means we can think of matrices both as
- vectors in matrix-vector space
- as analytic objects (as functions)
Notation
Let . We can view "". Then the operator norm
since the unit sphere is compact (closed and bounded is equivalent for vector spaces) and is continuous (and the norm is also continuous), the function will obtain its maximum.
. Then the is the greatest singular vlaue of .
Let
To see this, consider . Then since are unitary we have that And
(see)
Proposition
Let . Then (ie, the maximum column sum) and (ie the maximum row sum)
. Consider (the "Manhattan norm" because we "walk along the blocks"). We have Let be the index for the maximum column sum. Then and .
Let
Thus
Proposition
Let be a finite dimensional NLS with basis . Now, consider as vector spaces. (recall the dual space of a vector space).
Dual Norm
Note
Let be a norm on . Then for all we have And for all , we have ie the dual of the 1 norm is the infinity norm
- see dual norm
- These are “holder-like” inequalities
Theorem
The 1 norm is the dual norm of the infinity norm (and vice versa):
Proof
\lvert y^*x \rvert &= \left\lvert \sum_{i=1}^n \overline{y_{i}}x_{i} \right\rvert \\ &\leq \sum_{i=1}^n \lvert y_{i} \rvert \lvert x_{i} \rvert \\ &\leq \sum_{i=1}^n \lvert \lvert y \rvert \rvert _{\infty} \lvert x_{i} \rvert \\ &= \lvert \lvert x \rvert \rvert _{1} \lvert \lvert y \rvert \rvert _{\infty} \end{aligned}$$
Proposition
On , we have and
dual norm is .
By definition, the
Given m if we restrict to , then by definition of the dual, we have . Equality holds exactly when is all zeros, except for a in the position corresponding to .
Given an . If we restrict to the , then . Equality holds exactly when we choose an such that each entry is some unit so that all components of are real.
Given . If we restrict to , then . Equality holds for (unit length ) when , and an exactly analogous argument occurs for the reverse.